DOI： 10.7887/jcns.30.71

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

OBJECTIVE: Rebleeding of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is one of the significant risk factors for poor clinical outcome. The rebleeding risk is the highest during the acute phase with an approximate rebleeding rate of 9-17% within the first 24 h. Theoretically, general anesthesia can stabilize a patient's vital signs; however, its effectiveness as initial management for preventing post-aSAH rebleeding remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of ultra-early general anesthesia induction for reducing the rebleeding rates among patients with aSAH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with aSAH who were admitted to our department between January 2013 and December 2019. All the patients underwent ultra-early general anesthesia induction as initial management regardless of their severity. We evaluated the rebleeding rate before definitive treatment, factors influencing rebleeding, and general anesthesia complications. RESULTS: We included 191 patients with two-third of them having a poor clinical grade (World Federation of Neurological Society [WFNS] grade IV or V). The median duration from admission to general anesthesia induction was 22 min. Rebleeding before definitive treatment occurred in nine patients (4.7%). There were significant differences in the Glasgow Coma Scale score (p = 0.047), WFNS grade (p = 0.02), and dissecting aneurysm (p <0.001) between the rebleeding and non-rebleeding patients. There were no cases of unsuccessful tracheal intubation or rebleeding during general anesthesia induction. CONCLUSION: Ultra-early general anesthesia induction could be performed safely in patients with aSAH, regardless of the WFNS grade; moreover, it resulted in lower rebleeding rate than that reported in previous epidemiological reports.

DOI： 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105926

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Coagulation disorder is a major cause of death in sepsis patients. Recently, sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) scoring was developed as a new criterion for coagulopathy-associated sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the SIC score for predicting the prognosis of septic shock. We analyzed data from a multicenter observational study conducted from 2011 to 2013. We grouped the participants into those who did and did not use vasopressors, and compared the in-hospital mortality rates of SIC and non-SIC patients. Patients who needed vasopressors were considered to have septic shock. We performed survival analysis adjusted by factors independently associated with mortality. SIC developed in 66.4% of patients who used vasopressors and 42.2% of patients who did not. The in-hospital mortality difference between the SIC and non-SIC groups was statistically significant in those who needed vasopressors (35.8% vs 27.9%, p < 0.01). Cox regression analysis indicated that SIC was significantly correlated with mortality risk in patients who used vasopressors (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.70; p < 0.01), but not in those who did not (HR 1.38; 95% CI 0.81-2.34; p = 0.23). In conclusion, the SIC score might be a good diagnostic indicator of fatal coagulopathy among sepsis patients who need vasopressors.

DOI： 10.1007/s12185-021-03152-4

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Because of the aging of the Japanese population, traumatic brain injuries (TBI) have increased in elderly adults. However, the effectiveness and prognosis of intensive treatment for geriatric TBI have not yet been determined. Thus, we used nationwide data from the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank (JNTDB) projects to analyze prognostic factors for intensive and aggressive treatments. METHODS: We analyzed 1,879 geriatric TBI cases (age ≥65 years) registered in four JNTDB projects: Project 1998 (P1998) to Project 2015 (P2015). Clinical features, use of aggressive treatment, and 6-month outcomes on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) were compared among study projects. Logistic regression was used to identify prognostic factors in aggressively treated patients. RESULTS: The percentage of geriatric TBI cases significantly increased with time-P1998: 30.1%; Project 2004 (P2004): 34.6%; Project 2009 (P2009): 43.9%; P2015: 53.6%, p<0.0001). Use of aggressive treatment also significantly increased, from 67.0% in P1998 to 69.3% in P2015 (p<0.0001). Less invasive methods, such as trepanation and normothermic targeted temperature management, were more often chosen for geriatric patients. These efforts resulted in a significant decrease in the 6-month mortality rate, from 76.2% in P1998 to 63.1% in P2015 (p=0.0003), although the percentage of severely disabled patients increased, from 8.9% in P1998 to 11.1% in P2015 (p=0.0003). Intraventricular hemorrhage was the factor most strongly associated with unfavorable 6-month outcomes (OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.78-8.06, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Less invasive treatments reduced mortality in geriatric TBI but did not improve functional outcomes. Patient age was not the strongest prognostic factor; thus, physicians should consider characteristics other than age.

DOI： 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-404

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: The management of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) has changed drastically in the last decades, and surgery is the primary treatment. However, the optimum timing of early surgical treatment (within 24 h or 72 h after injury) is still controversial. We sought to determine the optimum timing of surgery for cervical SCI, comparing the length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay and in-hospital mortality in patients who underwent surgical treatments (decompression and stabilization) for cervical SCI within 24 h after injury and within 7 days after injury. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) which is a nationwide, multicenter database. We selected adult isolated cervical SCI patients who underwent operative management within 7 days after injury, between 2004 and 2015. The main outcome measures were the length of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality. We grouped the patients into two, based on the time from onset of injury to surgery, an early group (within 24 h) and a late group (from 25 h to 7 days). Next, we performed multivariable analyses for analyzing the relevance between the timing of surgery and the length of ICU stay after adjusting for baseline characteristics using propensity score. We also performed the Cox survival analyses to evaluate in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: From 236,698 trauma patients registered in JTDB, we analyzed 514 patients. The early group comprised 291 patients (56.6%), and the late group comprised 223 (43.4%). The length of ICU stay did not differ between the two groups (early, 10 days; late, 11 days; p = 0.29). There was no significant difference for length of ICU stay between the early and late group even after adjustment by multivariate analysis (p = 0.64). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (the early group 3.8%, the late group 2.2%, p = 0.32), and no significant difference was found in the Cox survival analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that neither the length of ICU stay nor in-hospital mortality after spinal column stabilization or spinal cord decompression for cervical SCI significantly differed according to the timing of surgery between 24 h and 7 days.

DOI： 10.1186/s13018-019-1341-4

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Purpose: Among mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI; a Glasgow Coma Scale score ≥13 on arrival), few result in severe neurological deficit, especially when they needed neurosurgical intervention. We investigated the association of intracranial pressure (ICP) control management with neurological outcome in patients with mTBI who needed neurosurgical intervention. Methods: From 1,092 records of the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank during 2009-2011, we retrospectively identified 195 patients with neurosurgical intervention for mTBI. Using the Glasgow Outcome Scale, we grouped records into two: favorable and poor outcome. We analyzed neurological outcomes using a logistic regression analysis adjusted for ICP control managements. Results: Seventy patients had a poor outcome. Logistic regression analysis revealed that sedatives, hyperosmotic agents, and hyperventilation therapy were significantly associated with poor outcome (odds ratio [OR]: 2.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-4.26; OR: 2.81, 95% CI: 1.17-6.75; OR: 9.36, 95% CI: 1.81-48.35). However, temperature management was significantly related with favorable outcome (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10-0.66). Conclusions: Our study, using a Japanese multicenter brain trauma registry, suggested that requirement of sedatives, hyperosmotic agents, and hyperventilation is associated with poor neurological outcome for patients with mTBI who underwent neurosurgical intervention, although temperature management was associated with favorable neurological outcome.

DOI： 10.1080/02699052.2019.1614667

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding functional outcome following poor-grade (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grades IV and V) aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), especially in individuals treated aggressively in the early phase after ictus. METHODS: We provided patients with aSAH with ultra-early definitive treatment, coiling or clipping, within 6 hours from arrival as per protocol. We classified the patients into 3 groups according to their computed tomography findings: Group 1, intraventricular hemorrhage with obstructive hydrocephalus; Group 2, massive intracerebral hemorrhage with brain herniation; and Group 3, neither Group 1 nor Group 2. We retrospectively evaluated patients with poor-grade aSAH who were admitted to our department between January 2013 and December 2016. We evaluated functional outcome at 6 months, defining modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-2 as good and those of 3-6 as poor outcomes. RESULTS: A good functional outcome was observed in 39.4% (28/71) of all cases. All-cause mortality at 6 months was 15.5% (11/71). A good outcome in Group 3 was significantly higher than that in the other two groups (Group 1 and 2 vs. Group 3, 20.8% vs. 48.9%, p = 0.02), even after adjustment with a multiple logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 6.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 34.8). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of patients with poor-grade aSAH became functionally independent, and approximately half of the patients with poor-grade aSAH who had neither intraventricular hemorrhage with obstructive hydrocephalus nor with brain herniation had good functional outcomes. Although further trials are required to confirm our results, ultra-early surgery may be considered for patients with poor-grade aSAH.

DOI： 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2019_86-203

PubMed

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本脳神経外傷学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本脳神経外傷学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本脳神経外傷学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本脳神経外傷学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本救急医学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本救急医学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本救急医学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：日本意識障害学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本外傷学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本外傷学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本臨床救急医学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本臨床救急医学会  

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：日本救急医学会-関東地方会  

74歳男性。駅前で心肺停止となり、バイスタンダーによる心肺蘇生とAEDによる除細動後に心拍が再開し搬送となった。精査の結果、心肺停止の原疾患は虚血性心疾患と判明したが、冠動脈の石灰化が高度であったため経皮的冠動脈形成術を行なえず、急性期管理として大動脈バルーンパンピング(IABP)を挿入した。蘇生後脳症に対しては低体温療法を施行し、意識は回復した。血行動態も安定したためIABPは第5病日に抜去したが、心不全の合併や不穏のため容易には人工呼吸器から離脱できず、冠動脈バイパス手術を勧めたが家族は希望しなかった。その後も内科的治療を継続したところ、心不全の改善および人工呼吸器離脱と抜管に至り、ADLも回復し、第66病日に自宅退院となった。

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本救急医学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本救急医学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本救急医学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本救急医学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本臨床救急医学会  

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：(一社)日本脳神経外傷学会  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：日本救急医学会-関東地方会  

researchmap