記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）  

BACKGROUND: In the intensive care unit (ICU), multiple intravenous drugs are often administered through the same catheter line, greatly increasing the risk of drug incompatibility. We previously developed a compatibility chart including 27 drugs and have used it to avoid drug incompatibilities in the ICU. This retrospective study evaluated the utility of this chart by analyzing prescriptions and incidents of incompatibilities in an ICU. METHODS: We analyzed 257 ICU prescriptions of two or more continuous infusions on the same day during the period between March 2016 and February 2017 and investigated the rate of compliance with the compatibility chart. Drug combinations were classified as "compatible," "tolerable compatible," "incompatible," and "no data." For all combinations, the compliance rate was defined as the ratio of compatible and tolerable compatible combinations. Additionally, using our hospital incident report database, we analyzed 27,117 injections administered in the ICU between March 2016 and February 2017 and investigated incidents related to incompatibility. RESULTS: Three hundred infusion combinations were identified in the prescriptions. The compliance rate was 97% (n = 293). Of the 113 combinations judged to be tolerable compatible, 98% (n = 111) consisted of three or more continuous medications injected through the same intravenous line. Of the two incidents related to incompatibility in the incident report database, the combination "nicardipine and furosemide" was defined as incompatible in the compatibility chart. CONCLUSIONS: The high rate of compliance with the compatibility chart suggested it was useful in preventing drug incompatibility.

DOI： 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2022_89-220

PubMed

researchmap

記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）  

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have reported the association between age and mortality in COVID-19 patients who require invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We aimed to evaluate the effect of age on COVID-19-related mortality among patients undergoing IMV therapy. METHODS: This cohort study was conducted using the COVID-19 Registry Japan database, a nationwide multi-centre study of hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Of all 33,808 cases registered between 1 January 2020 to 28 February 2021, we analysed 1555 patients who had undergone IMV. We evaluated mortality rates between age groups using multivariable regression analysis after adjusting for known potential components, such as within-hospital clustering, comorbidities, steroid use, medication for COVID-19, and vital signs on admission, using generalized estimation equation. RESULTS: By age group, the mortality rates in the IMV group were 8.6%, 20.7%, 34.9%, 49.7% and 83.3% for patients in their 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that compared with those for patients aged < 60 years, the odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of death were 2.6 (1.6-4.1), 6.9 (4.2-11.3), 13.2 (7.2-24.1), 92.6 (16.7-515.0) for patients in their 60s, 70s, 80s, and 90s, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort study, age had a great effect on mortality in COVID-19 patients undergoing IMV, after adjusting for variables independently associated with mortality. This study suggested that age was associated with higher mortality and that preventing progression to severe COVID-19 in elderly patients may be a great public health issue.

DOI： 10.1186/s13613-021-00959-6

PubMed

researchmap

DOI： 10.7887/jcns.30.71

researchmap

記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）  

OBJECTIVE: Rebleeding of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is one of the significant risk factors for poor clinical outcome. The rebleeding risk is the highest during the acute phase with an approximate rebleeding rate of 9-17% within the first 24 h. Theoretically, general anesthesia can stabilize a patient's vital signs; however, its effectiveness as initial management for preventing post-aSAH rebleeding remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and safety of ultra-early general anesthesia induction for reducing the rebleeding rates among patients with aSAH. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with aSAH who were admitted to our department between January 2013 and December 2019. All the patients underwent ultra-early general anesthesia induction as initial management regardless of their severity. We evaluated the rebleeding rate before definitive treatment, factors influencing rebleeding, and general anesthesia complications. RESULTS: We included 191 patients with two-third of them having a poor clinical grade (World Federation of Neurological Society [WFNS] grade IV or V). The median duration from admission to general anesthesia induction was 22 min. Rebleeding before definitive treatment occurred in nine patients (4.7%). There were significant differences in the Glasgow Coma Scale score (p = 0.047), WFNS grade (p = 0.02), and dissecting aneurysm (p <0.001) between the rebleeding and non-rebleeding patients. There were no cases of unsuccessful tracheal intubation or rebleeding during general anesthesia induction. CONCLUSION: Ultra-early general anesthesia induction could be performed safely in patients with aSAH, regardless of the WFNS grade; moreover, it resulted in lower rebleeding rate than that reported in previous epidemiological reports.

DOI： 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105926

PubMed

researchmap

記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）  

Coagulation disorder is a major cause of death in sepsis patients. Recently, sepsis-induced coagulopathy (SIC) scoring was developed as a new criterion for coagulopathy-associated sepsis. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the SIC score for predicting the prognosis of septic shock. We analyzed data from a multicenter observational study conducted from 2011 to 2013. We grouped the participants into those who did and did not use vasopressors, and compared the in-hospital mortality rates of SIC and non-SIC patients. Patients who needed vasopressors were considered to have septic shock. We performed survival analysis adjusted by factors independently associated with mortality. SIC developed in 66.4% of patients who used vasopressors and 42.2% of patients who did not. The in-hospital mortality difference between the SIC and non-SIC groups was statistically significant in those who needed vasopressors (35.8% vs 27.9%, p < 0.01). Cox regression analysis indicated that SIC was significantly correlated with mortality risk in patients who used vasopressors (hazard ratio [HR] 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.70; p < 0.01), but not in those who did not (HR 1.38; 95% CI 0.81-2.34; p = 0.23). In conclusion, the SIC score might be a good diagnostic indicator of fatal coagulopathy among sepsis patients who need vasopressors.

DOI： 10.1007/s12185-021-03152-4

PubMed

researchmap

記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）  

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the blood concentration of levetiracetam (LEV), as a second-line drug, in patients with status epilepticus (SE) in an emergency clinical setting. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 20 consecutive patients with SE admitted to our department between July 2017 and July 2019. LEV (2500 mg) was administered via bolus infusion after diazepam infusion, followed by 500 mg every 12 h for 48 h and then 500 mg orally. The primary outcomes were LEV blood concentration 15 min, 12 h, 48 h, and 96 h after administration and the proportion of patients showing trough LEV concentration within the therapeutic range. The secondary outcomes were the discontinuation of apparent convulsive seizure, epileptic wave on electroencephalogram, tracheal intubation, adverse events related to blood parameters, and abnormal findings in vital signs examination. RESULTS: Median blood LEV (2500 mg) concentration at 15 min after administration was 81.6 μg/mL. The median trough concentration after 12, 48, and 96 h was 28.8, 10.5, and 9.1 μg/mL, respectively. Moreover, 95% of patients had trough concentration above the lower limit of the therapeutic blood concentration (>12 μg/mL) after 12 h. Regarding secondary outcomes, endotracheal intubation, seizure suppression, and abnormal electroencephalogram findings were observed in approximately 40%, 90%-95%, and 41% of patients, respectively. No abnormal findings were noted in blood tests and vital sign examination, although the AST/ALT levels increased in 10% of the patients. CONCLUSION: After bolus administration of 2500 mg, the blood LEV concentration reached the therapeutic window in patients with early-stage SE.

DOI： 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.04.017

PubMed

researchmap

記述言語：日本語   出版者・発行元：(一社)日本外傷学会  

researchmap

記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）  

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) remains unknown. We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endovascular treatment for ABAO. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated patients with ABAO who underwent MT using modern stent retrievers and an aspiration device between January 2015 and March 2019 at 12 comprehensive stroke centers. Functional outcomes and 90-day mortality rates were analyzed as primary outcomes. Factors influencing outcomes were analyzed as secondary outcomes. Relationships between outcome and affected area of infarction on arrival were also analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included. Good outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2) was achieved in 25/73 patients (34.2%) and the all-cause 90-day mortality rate was 23.3% (17/73). Successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction grade 2b and 3) was achieved in 70/73 patients (95.9%). In univariate analyses, age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, and posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (pc-ASPECTS) differed significantly between good and poor functional outcome groups. Age and pc-ASPECTS were significantly associated with functional outcomes in the logistic regression model. Positive findings for the midbrain on diffusion-weighted imaging on pc-ASPECTS and brainstem score were significantly associated with poor outcomes. CONCLUSION: MT with modern devices for ABAO resulted in highly successful recanalization and good outcomes. A positive finding for the midbrain on initial imaging might predict poor outcomes. Further studies are required to confirm our results.

DOI： 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.12.034

PubMed

researchmap

記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）  

BACKGROUND: Some reports suggest the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute vertebrobasilar artery (VBA) occlusion. The major causes of VBA occlusion include cardioembolism (CE) and large-artery atherosclerosis (LAA). However, the clinical characteristics of each cause remain unclear, and they might be important for decision making related to the indications and strategy of MT. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare functional outcomes and factors affecting outcomes between patients with CE and LAA with acute VBA occlusion. METHODS: This was a retrospective and prospective observational study using data from TREAT (Tokyo-Tama-Registry of Acute Endovascular Thrombectomy), a multicenter registry of MT for acute large-vessel occlusion in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Patients with VBA occlusion classified into CE and LAA groups were analyzed. The primary outcome was a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients (57 with CE and 22 with LAA) were eligible from January 2015 to March 2020. Despite significantly shorter puncture-to-recanalization and onset-or-last-well-known-to-recanalization times in the CE group, the primary outcome was not significantly different between the 2 groups (CE, 31.6% vs. LAA, 45.5%; P = 0.248). In the subgroup analysis, patients with CE had worse clinical outcomes in the onset-or-last-well-known-to-door time ≥180 minutes, onset-or-last-well-known-to-door time ≥300 minutes, and low posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (≤7) subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Functional outcomes of VBA occlusion were not significantly different between CE and LAA. Based on the subgroup analysis, patients with CE might have poorer collateral status than do patients with LAA, and earlier recanalization might therefore be desired.

DOI： 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.01.071

PubMed

researchmap

記述言語：日本語   出版者・発行元：(一社)日本外傷学会  

researchmap

記述言語：日本語   出版者・発行元：(一社)日本救急医学会  

researchmap

記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）  

BACKGROUND: Due to aging of the Japanese population, traumatic brain injuries (TBI) in elderly individuals have increased. However, the effectiveness and prognosis of intensive treatment in geriatric TBI have not yet been determined. Thus, we analyzed the prognostic factors of intensive and aggressive treatments using nationwide data from Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank (JNTDB) projects. METHODS: We analyzed 1,879 geriatric TBI cases (≥65 years old) registered in four JNTDB projects, Project 1998 (P1998) to Project 2015 (P2015). Clinical features, aggressive treatment usage, and 6-month outcomes on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) were compared among study projects. Logistic regression was performed to clarify prognostic factors in aggressively-treated patients. RESULTS: The percentage of geriatric TBI cases significantly increased across time (P1998: 30.1%, Project 2004 (P2004) : 34.6%, Project 2009 (P2009) : 43.9%, P2015: 53.6%, p<0.0001). Aggressive treatment usage also significantly increased, from 67.0% in P1998 to 69.3% in P2015 (p<0.0001). Less invasive methods, such as trepanation and normothermic targeted temperature management, were more often chosen for geriatric patients. These efforts resulted in a significant decrease in the 6-month mortality rate, from 76.2% in P1998 to 63.1% in P2015 (p=0.0003), although the percentage of severely disabled patients increased, from 8.9% in P1998 to 11.1% in P2015 (p = 0.0003). Intraventricular hemorrhage was the most unfavorable prognostic factor for the 6-month outcome (OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.78-8.06, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Less invasive treatments reduce mortality in geriatric TBI but do not improve functional outcomes. The patients' age does not seem to be the strongest prognostic factor; thus, physicians should not adhere to only age.

DOI： 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2021_88-404

PubMed

researchmap

記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）  

BACKGROUND: The management of cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) has changed drastically in the last decades, and surgery is the primary treatment. However, the optimum timing of early surgical treatment (within 24 h or 72 h after injury) is still controversial. We sought to determine the optimum timing of surgery for cervical SCI, comparing the length of the intensive care unit (ICU) stay and in-hospital mortality in patients who underwent surgical treatments (decompression and stabilization) for cervical SCI within 24 h after injury and within 7 days after injury. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using Japan Trauma Data Bank (JTDB) which is a nationwide, multicenter database. We selected adult isolated cervical SCI patients who underwent operative management within 7 days after injury, between 2004 and 2015. The main outcome measures were the length of ICU stay and in-hospital mortality. We grouped the patients into two, based on the time from onset of injury to surgery, an early group (within 24 h) and a late group (from 25 h to 7 days). Next, we performed multivariable analyses for analyzing the relevance between the timing of surgery and the length of ICU stay after adjusting for baseline characteristics using propensity score. We also performed the Cox survival analyses to evaluate in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: From 236,698 trauma patients registered in JTDB, we analyzed 514 patients. The early group comprised 291 patients (56.6%), and the late group comprised 223 (43.4%). The length of ICU stay did not differ between the two groups (early, 10 days; late, 11 days; p = 0.29). There was no significant difference for length of ICU stay between the early and late group even after adjustment by multivariate analysis (p = 0.64). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (the early group 3.8%, the late group 2.2%, p = 0.32), and no significant difference was found in the Cox survival analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that neither the length of ICU stay nor in-hospital mortality after spinal column stabilization or spinal cord decompression for cervical SCI significantly differed according to the timing of surgery between 24 h and 7 days.

DOI： 10.1186/s13018-019-1341-4

Web of Science

PubMed

researchmap

記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）  

OBJECTIVE: The effectiveness of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute basilar artery occlusion (ABAO) remains unknown. We evaluated the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endovascular treatment for ABAO. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated patients with ABAO who underwent MT, using modern stent retrievers and an aspiration device, between January 2015 and December 2017 at 12 comprehensive stroke centers. Functional outcomes and 90-day mortality were analyzed as primary outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included. Good outcome (modified Rankin Scale mRS 0-2) was achieved in 20/48 patients and the all-cause 90-day mortality rate was 25%. Successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction [mTICI] grade 2b and 3) was achieved in 47/48 patients. National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (pc-ASPECTS), DWI Brain Stem Score, mTICI (3 > 2b), and intracranial hemorrhage were significantly different between good and poor functional outcome groups. The occlusion site of BA was significantly different between patients with moderate outcome (mRS 0-3) versus others. We found that age, pc-ASPECTS and mTICI were significantly associated with functional outcomes in the logistic regression model. CONCLUSION: MT with stent retrievers and an aspiration device for ABAO results in high successful recanalization and good outcomes. Further studies are required to confirm our results.

DOI： 10.1016/j.jns.2019.04.010

PubMed

researchmap

記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）  

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding functional outcome following poor-grade (World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies grades IV and V) aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH), especially in individuals treated aggressively in the early phase after ictus. METHODS: We provided patients with aSAH with ultra-early definitive treatment, coiling or clipping, within 6 hours from arrival as per protocol. We classified the patients into 3 groups according to their computed tomography findings: Group 1, intraventricular hemorrhage with obstructive hydrocephalus; Group 2, massive intracerebral hemorrhage with brain herniation; and Group 3, neither Group 1 nor Group 2. We retrospectively evaluated patients with poor-grade aSAH who were admitted to our department between January 2013 and December 2016. We evaluated functional outcome at 6 months, defining modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 0-2 as good and those of 3-6 as poor outcomes. RESULTS: A good functional outcome was observed in 39.4% (28/71) of all cases. All-cause mortality at 6 months was 15.5% (11/71). A good outcome in Group 3 was significantly higher than that in the other two groups (Group 1 and 2 vs. Group 3, 20.8% vs. 48.9%, p = 0.02), even after adjustment with a multiple logistic regression analysis (odds ratio 6.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 34.8). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 40% of patients with poor-grade aSAH became functionally independent, and approximately half of the patients with poor-grade aSAH who had neither intraventricular hemorrhage with obstructive hydrocephalus nor with brain herniation had good functional outcomes. Although further trials are required to confirm our results, ultra-early surgery may be considered for patients with poor-grade aSAH.

DOI： 10.1272/jnms.JNMS.2019_86-203

PubMed

researchmap

掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）   出版者・発行元：Society for Clinical Epidemiology  

DOI： 10.37737/ace.1.2_69

researchmap

記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）  

Purpose: Among mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI; a Glasgow Coma Scale score ≥13 on arrival), few result in severe neurological deficit, especially when they needed neurosurgical intervention. We investigated the association of intracranial pressure (ICP) control management with neurological outcome in patients with mTBI who needed neurosurgical intervention. Methods: From 1,092 records of the Japan Neurotrauma Data Bank during 2009-2011, we retrospectively identified 195 patients with neurosurgical intervention for mTBI. Using the Glasgow Outcome Scale, we grouped records into two: favorable and poor outcome. We analyzed neurological outcomes using a logistic regression analysis adjusted for ICP control managements. Results: Seventy patients had a poor outcome. Logistic regression analysis revealed that sedatives, hyperosmotic agents, and hyperventilation therapy were significantly associated with poor outcome (odds ratio [OR]: 2.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-4.26; OR: 2.81, 95% CI: 1.17-6.75; OR: 9.36, 95% CI: 1.81-48.35). However, temperature management was significantly related with favorable outcome (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.10-0.66). Conclusions: Our study, using a Japanese multicenter brain trauma registry, suggested that requirement of sedatives, hyperosmotic agents, and hyperventilation is associated with poor neurological outcome for patients with mTBI who underwent neurosurgical intervention, although temperature management was associated with favorable neurological outcome.

DOI： 10.1080/02699052.2019.1614667

Web of Science

PubMed

researchmap

記述言語：英語   掲載種別：研究論文（学術雑誌）   出版者・発行元：SPRINGER  

PURPOSE: The latest resuscitation guidelines recommend the use of amiodarone in adult patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) to improve the rates of return of spontaneous circulation. However, there is limited evidence to suggest that amiodarone is superior to lidocaine with respect to survival at discharge. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the hypothesis that amiodarone is superior to lidocaine with regard to the rate of survival to hospital discharge for OHCA patients with VF/pulseless VT (pVT) on hospital arrival. METHODS: Using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database, we identified 3951 patients from 795 hospitals who experienced cardiogenic OHCA and had refractory ventricular fibrillation on hospital arrival between July 2007 and March 2013. The patients were categorized into amiodarone (n = 1743) and lidocaine (n = 2208) groups, from which 801 propensity score-matched pairs were generated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the rate of survival to hospital discharge between the amiodarone and lidocaine groups (15.2 % vs. 17.1 %; difference, -1.9 %; 95 % CI, -5.5 to 1.7) in propensity score-matched analyses. Cox regression analyses did not indicate significant in-hospital mortality differences between the amiodarone and lidocaine groups for the propensity score-matched groups (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95 % CI, 0.94 to 1.17). CONCLUSIONS: The present nationwide study suggested that there was no significant difference in the rate of survival to hospital discharge between cardiogenic OHCA patients with persistent ventricular fibrillation on hospital arrival treated with amiodarone or lidocaine.

DOI： 10.1007/s10557-016-6689-7

Web of Science

PubMed

researchmap

記述言語：日本語   出版者・発行元：(一社)日本外傷学会  

researchmap

記述言語：日本語   出版者・発行元：(一社)日本外傷学会  

researchmap

記述言語：日本語   出版者・発行元：(一社)日本脳神経外傷学会  

researchmap

記述言語：日本語   出版者・発行元：(一社)日本脳神経外傷学会  

researchmap

記述言語：日本語   出版者・発行元：日本救急医学会-関東地方会  

researchmap

記述言語：日本語   出版者・発行元：日本医科大学医学会  

researchmap

記述言語：英語   出版者・発行元：(一社)日本救急医学会  

researchmap