Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: This study aimed to illustrate the utility of our original system to deliver vascular plugs into aortic side branches during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). TECHNIQUE: Our device, which we named "System-F," consists of a 14 Fr sheath, a 12 Fr long sheath with a side hole, a stiff guidewire as a shaft, and a parallelly-inserted delivery catheter navigated through the side hole into the aneurysm sac. Vertical motion and horizontal rotation of the side hole allow multidimensional movement of the delivery catheter within the aneurysm. This system was applied in 7 cases undergoing EVAR; 4 inferior mesenteric arteries and 14 lumbar arteries were embolized using vascular plugs. Type II endoleak (T2EL) was not observed in the follow-up survey of any case. CONCLUSION: The applicability of System-F for vascular plug placement in the side branches of abdominal aortic aneurysms has the potential to achieve high delivery capability and be widely applied for the prevention of T2EL.Clinical ImpactSystem-F has potential to change the strategies of pre-EVAR embolization.

DOI： 10.1177/15266028231179422

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

Acute portal vein thrombosis is characterized by nonspecific abdominal pain, causing severe morbidity and mortality. Prompt diagnosis is crucial to avoid short-term complications such as intestinal infarction, sepsis, and death. The therapeutic goal is to prevent thrombus extension into the mesenteric veins and intestinal ischemia complications. Systemic anticoagulation is the standard treatment. However, endovascular treatments such as thrombolysis, thrombectomy, balloon angioplasty, stent placement, and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement have been performed in patients who are refractory to anticoagulation therapy or at a high risk of intestinal ischemia. This review discusses the clinical and diagnostic considerations in acute portal vein thrombosis, focusing on current endovascular treatments that are effective and safe. However, prospective data are required to compare endovascular treatment techniques and assess their outcomes.

DOI： 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2023-0027

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

BACKGROUND: The association between the occlusion rate of the side branch arteries branching from the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac and aneurysm sac shrinkage is unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive embolization of multiple side branch arteries branching from the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac in early aneurysm sac shrinkage after endovascular aneurysm repair. METHODS: Patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms, with or without preemptive embolization of multiple side branch arteries, including the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries, between January 2016 and August 2021, were retrospectively evaluated. Preemptive embolization was introduced at our institution in January 2018 and has been performed in all patients who undergo endovascular aneurysm repair since then. We compared occlusion rates of the side branch arteries, frequency of type 2 endoleaks, changes in aneurysm sac size, percentage of aneurysm sac size decrease, and frequency of reduction in the aneurysm sac diameter by > 5 mm. RESULTS: The study included 43 patients in the embolization group and 20 in the nonembolization group. Preemptive embolization was successfully performed without any ischemic complications. The total occlusion rate of side branch arteries was significantly higher in the embolization group than in the nonembolization group (70.2% vs. 29.3%, P < 0.05). At 24 months of follow-up, the type 2 endoleak frequency was significantly lower in the embolization group than in the nonembolization group (6.9% vs. 31.6%, P < 0.05). The frequency of reduction in the aneurysm sac diameter by > 5 mm was significantly higher in the embolization group than in the nonembolization group at 24 months (62.1% vs. 31.6% P < 0.05). The optimal cutoff value for the total occlusion rate of the side branch arteries to achieve reduction in the aneurysm sac diameter by > 5 mm at 24 months, after endovascular aneurysm repair, was 66.7% in all patients (area under the curve = 0.634; sensitivity = 62.5%; specificity = 70.8%). These findings suggest that occluding 66.7% or more of the side branch arteries may result in early aneurysmal shrinkage. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive embolization of multiple side branch arteries, branching from the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac, may contribute to early aneurysm sac shrinkage; this may serve as a marker for fewer late complications after endovascular aneurysm repair.

DOI： 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.024

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)  

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of n-butyl cyanoacrylate (nBCA)-ethiodized oil (NE) mixture and nBCA-ethiodized oil-ethanol (NEE) mixture embolization for Type II endoleak (T2EL) after endovascular aortic repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 32 patients with 49 procedures who underwent T2EL embolization between January 2008 and June 2022. Cases with no follow-up after embolization, technical failure, treatment with coil only, Type I endoleak at the embolization, and re-embolization were excluded. The resultant final cohort included 24 patients (14 men and 10 women; mean age, 83.3 years [interquartile range, 77-89 years]) who underwent initial T2EL embolization, with 15 patients in the NE group and 9 patients in the NEE group. The 2 groups were compared in terms of adverse events (AEs), freedom from sac enlargement, and freedom from reintervention. RESULTS: The follow-up period after embolization for T2EL was 960 days (SD ± 1,007) in the NE group and 484 days (SD ± 192) in the NEE group, without significant differences. No AEs above moderate were observed in either group. The rate of freedom from sac enlargement at 1 year was 65.0% in the NE group and 87.5% in the NEE group (P = .03). The rate of freedom from reintervention at 1 year was 69.2% in the NE group and 100.0% in the NEE group (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The NEE group had significantly higher rates of freedom from sac enlargement and reintervention at 1 year compared with the NE group. These results suggest that T2EL embolization with NEE may be more effective than that with NE.

DOI： 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.07.023

PubMed

researchmap

Language：English  

DOI： 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.03.031

PubMed

researchmap

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

J-GLOBAL

researchmap